imranontech.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the imranontech.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host imranontech.com. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Automattic Inc .

the related websites

urlm.co.uk rd.springer.com neosoftware.com love2d.org 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

imran on tech musings on technology, development, and the world in general home about jump to navigation the origin of “hacker” april 1, 2008 posted by imran ghory in computer security , etymology . 34 comments everytime the media carries a sensationalist story about “hackers” committing cybercrimes there’s always an uproar among geeks about the misappropriation of the word “hacker”. sadly it’s the geeks who are mistaken and not for once the media. a few years ago fred shapiro tracked down the earliest known reference to computer hackers: 1963 the tech (mit student newspaper) 20 nov. 1 many telephone services have been curtailed because of so-called hackers, according to prof. carlton tucker, administrator of the institute phone system. … the hackers have accomplished such things as tying up all the tie-lines between harvard and mit, or making long-distance calls by charging them to a local radar installation. one method involved connecting the pdp-1 computer to the phone system to search the lines until a dial tone, indicating an outside line, was found. … because of the “hacking,” the majority of the mit phones are “trapped.” this is the earliest know usage of hacker in the modern sense, the tmrc dictionary has it a few years earlier but not in the computer sense. the earliest computer related uses of the term (through anecdotal evidence) were also malicious (although the term wasn’t originally intended maliciously – in practice it was) in the sense that they involved gaining unauthorized access to computers to play on. the modern “geek” definition of the term hacker to reflect a skilled programmer didn’t originate until the late seventies when the term ended up in the later famous jargon file . that doesn’t mean to say we should all stop using the word “hacker” in it’s positive sense, but as evidence advocating geeks we should at least stop claiming a false history to support our cause. as we all know where that ends up. in response to those who disagree with me: if you think i’m wrong then show me the evidence, if you can find earlier records showing hack(er)s being used in a computer context in a non-“black hat” manner i’d be happy to retract my post and put the evidence up here. advertisements studying for job interviews isn’t cheating april 1, 2008 posted by imran ghory in job interviews . 10 comments teacher : does anyone know why breaking mirrors is bad luck ? boy 1: [long boring in-depth explanation] teacher: well done that’s exactly right have some merit points boy 2: that’s not fair, he’s cheating, he’s been reading up on it. teacher: that’s not cheating, that’s the point of school some of the respondants to my earlier posts on interviewing seem to be of the opinion that studying books which teach you to do interviews is a form of “cheating”, that reaction caused me to remember the above scene from my childhood. interviews are just like any other test, studying up is expected and necessary. sure if you’re good you can just breeze into a test without preparation and get an ok mark. but interviewers mark to a curve. if you’re not on the top you’re not going to get in with an “ok” mark. a quick look at amazon reveals a staggering 1152 books on interviewing – improving interview skills obviously isn’t a small market. it’s arguable that interviewers should take into account how good the person genuinely is and not how well they perform in an interview. that’s actually very hard. you can tell if a candidate is reciting an earlier memorized answer, but a lot of the time you can’t tell if the candidate has just practiced a lot of interview questions. the other solution to equalizing the impact of studying beforehand is to tell everyone to study up and let that balance everyone out, and that in part is what i’m trying to do here. when i was a student and looking for my first job i interviewed with a number of software development companies, in most of the interviews 70-80% of the questions asked were straight out of one of the interview books i had read. i can only imagine how the other candidates who went into the interviews unprepared coped. of course improvement doesn’t occur in a void, if a candidate practices it won’t just improve their interview skills it will also improve their underlying skills which is what the interviewer is trying to measure. most companies wouldn’t hesitate to reject an interview candidate who hadn’t read up on the company beforehand. shouldn’t that extend to interviewing skills in general ? after all learning to interview well shows motivation, self-study skills and preparation. three things which are notoriously hard to measure in interviews. even if i could easily identify candidates who’ve practiced for the interview, i’m not sure i wouldn’t consider it a plus rather than a negative. a bad candidate with good interview skills isn’t going to seem like a good candidate in interview (at least in technical interviews where “all-talk” candidates typically fall down, regardless of how much they’ve tried to memorize). it might however make an average candidate seem good – but then i think i might prefer an average candidate who’s motivated, self-studying and well-prepared over a good candidate who survives on pure talent alone. it would certainly be a close call. so if you’ve got an interview coming up, then take a moment to go down your local bookstore or browse through amazon and pick up a book to brush up your interview skills. because if you don’t you may lose the job to someone who did. who (doesn’t) recruit the best computer science graduates? march 26, 2008 posted by imran ghory in computer science , recruitment . 21 comments while doing some research on how software companies recruit new graduates i came up with a strategy to break firms into separate categories depending on which universities they targeted for recruitment. the results of this research threw up an interesting anomaly – while in general it followed the pattern one might expect (“high-prestige” technical firms going after the best unis, defence and consultancy firms after the next tier, misc business apps the next tier, and so on). however there was one notable exception to this pattern. microsoft. despite the firms bad reputation among “geeks” microsoft is still a prestigious technical firm to work for, one which has a number of notable researchers and developers in a number of fields. yet when it comes to recruiting students microsoft seems to have given up believing in itself and is now targeting “average” computer science students rather than the best and the brightest. but before i go further i’d like to explain my methodology. i built up a database recording which universities are targeted by software companies and used the the times league table for computer science as a benchmark to rank computer science departments. the actual information about where firms hire most of their graduates is unfortunately not available to the public, however we do have a good proxy measures. we can see the universities that firms target (i.e universities where they run recruitment talks, events, etc.), which due to these activities very nature is public information. using this information we can cluster firms together based upon the ranks of the universities they target. to show by example: here we show the universities target by three “prestigious” technical firms (microsoft, google and data connection). google is obviously a “hot” destination for computer science graduates and is well known for wanting to hire the smartest people. data connection is a telecoms software firm with a very strong reputation in the uk for software development excellence, they’re frequently ranked as one of the most desirable firms to work for in the uk. the average ranking for a computer science department targeted by google is 5.5, for data connection a slightly higher 9.6. for microsoft it’s 36.2. the difference is staggering. google and data connection are targeting the top-t

URL analysis for imranontech.com

https://imranontech.com/2008/04/01/studying-for-job-interviews-isnt-cheating/
https://imranontech.com/comments/feed/
https://imranontech.com/2006/12/04/are-algorithms-copyrightable/
https://imranontech.com/2006/11/
https://imranontech.com/2006/07/
https://imranontech.com/2008/03/26/who-doesnt-recruit-the-best-computer-science-graduates/
https://imranontech.com/feed/
https://imranontech.com/2007/01/10/why-logic-puzzles-make-good-interview-questions/
https://imranontech.com/category/etymology/
https://imranontech.com/2007/01/
https://imranontech.com/2008/03/
https://imranontech.com/2006/09/
https://imranontech.com/2007/05/
https://imranontech.com/2008/04/01/studying-for-job-interviews-isnt-cheating/#comments
https://imranontech.com/2008/04/01/the-origin-of-hacker/#comments
extras.timesonline.co.uk
coderstack.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: IMRANONTECH.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1439604968_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.wildwestdomains.com
Registrar URL: http://www.wildwestdomains.com
Updated Date: 2018-03-03T13:25:15Z
Creation Date: 2008-03-31T23:27:49Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-03-31T23:27:49Z
Registrar: Wild West Domains, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 440
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS1.WORDPRESS.COM
Name Server: NS2.WORDPRESS.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-08-25T17:59:23Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR Wild West Domains, LLC

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =imranontech.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME imranontech.com

  CHANGED 2018-03-03

  CREATED 2008-03-31

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS1.WORDPRESS.COM 198.181.116.9

  NS2.WORDPRESS.COM 198.181.117.9

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .